Peer review of doctoral dissertations as a Quality Control Mechanism

In the challenging world such as today with so many of institutions propping up for dissertations, it has become essential for institutes to stand tall by imparting academic culture pertaining to new ideas and intellectual leadership by creating dissertations with utmost quality adherence. Dissertation is more common in institutions and doctoral schools, and these professional bodies are now giving more attention to accountability and quality enhancement of the research papers. They are continuously prioritizing resources in increasing the quality assurance of the research papers published through their institutions. One of the key challenges faced by the institutions is to ensure that the commitment, acceptance and participation of academic members in matters of quality assurance.

Peer review becomes an integral and important role in measuring the quality of dissertations. Research study also says that there is a strong correlation between the kind of research environment inculcated and the quality of the research dissertations thus produced. Institutes are building up indicators of individual progression, net research time, transferable skills, and professional development of researcher in order to build quality culture. It is said that peer-review and supervision are high priority tasks for inculcating such culture.

Peer-review in academic institutions is about building a high quality and personalized relationship with the researcher. Reviewer helps in developing the research elements, avoiding pitfalls and in giving more concrete knowledge in a specific domain. This mechanism helps in building good quality research papers with sharing of experiences and best practices.

Advertisement

Reviewing PhD thesis from an expert’s angle

Writing PhD does not mean you have passed the hurdle of the final examination. We all are not proficient writers and hence, there is always a scope of errors, shortcomings and lack of structured approach in the dissertation. It is always better that somebody who has a command over the subject reviews it and modifies accordingly. Sending the material to an expert writer is a fantastic idea.

They are expert in doing the improvement for thesis written for PhD submission because they know how to write it? The members of panel are PhD guides and senior professors that are associated with the leading educational institutions. They are closely associated with the process of thesis writing. Reviewing a PhD thesis is absolutely easy for them. You can consider it as a PhD viva rehearsal before the actual one.

How they help in making the thesis perfect?

There are many ways they help in the thesis refinement.

a) It is like taking the expert’s comments: Because the people who are going to review are Doctorate and they have at least two research associates working under them for PhD research. They will check each and every line of your work and suggest changes in the content, correct the grammatical and conceptual mistakes, look towards the research methodology in a critical aspect and finally suggest the formatting changes to make your thesis the perfect one. They know the points that draw maximum attention during the interview and hence work on those keenly.

b) Global recognition: The name has recognition worldwide and hundreds of universities have recommended the services and admired for the excellent quality of work.

c) Make the corrections beforehand: Appearing to the PhD viva with a half-cooked thesis is not a good thing. You will have tough time in the final interview. It is always better if the errors are corrected well in advance and you go for final submission well-prepared. Make the language and vocabulary rich, add citations that are impressive and change the formatting in the better way. Corrections in the PhD thesis improve the quality and make it up to the mark.

Contact Today!

The world of Internet has made the things quite easy. You need to type the necessary keywords in the search window and the system will give a list of service providers for PhD thesis review services. Submit the work to an appropriate agency and get the work reviewed from an expert’s angle!

Providing constructive criticism for a dissertation

Getting your dissertation reviewed by your peers is considered to be the most important aspect of the entire dissertation writing & submission journey. Being a research scholar, it is entirely your responsibility to provide your dissertation to reviewers who are competent in reviewing and scanning your research document in the most professional manner, thereby guiding you in the right direction.

It is absolutely essential for the dissertation readers as well as the reviewers to remember that constructive criticism is not an attack on the person or the research. It is actually a mechanism of increasing the quality/credibility of the thesis/dissertation by highlighting areas that require immediate attention. The peers reviewing the research document provide useful information to the writer and ensure that he/she is being able to eliminate all the un-wanted ambiguities from his/her research document.

While reviewing the research paper, the reviewing committee members make it a point to ensure that the writer understands the material that is included within the paper. The reviewers point out all the gaps between ideas portrayed within the dissertation/thesis paper. It is absolutely essential for the research scholar to take the reviewing process as a learning technique. He/she should not get disheartened with the comments provided by the reviewers but should rather take them in a positive manner. I hope the information furbished in this blog would have definitely helped you recognize the importance of peer review of a dissertation.

Dissertation peer review- Key feature of dissertation submission process

Submitting a complete dissertation is not an easy task and requires a great amount of dedication and passion. If you too are a research student who is about to submit his/her dissertation to the research committee, then it is absolutely important for you to opt for the dissertation peer reviewers who would put in their best efforts towards making your dissertation 100% flawless.

Here is a pictorial representation of the important steps which are being undertaken by each member of a dissertation peer review team:

• Improving the sentence structure– The dissertation peer reviewers ensure to improve the flow of sentences within the dissertation. They make it a point to include sentences which carry a meaning. A dissertation without meaning is considered to be a bad dissertation and hence a peer reviewer needs to be hired in order to eliminate the sentence structure errors.

• Checking the placement of quotations– Another important point which is being kept in mind by the dissertation peer reviewers is checking the placement of quotations. Inserting quotations at the wrong places might adversely interfere with the credibility of the research document. The peer reviewers make it a point that all the quotations are being placed at the right places.

• Eliminating grammar & spelling errors– Last but definitely not the least, eliminating grammatical and spelling errors from the dissertation is yet another most important factor which is being considered by the peer reviewers.

Now that you are familiar with what the dissertation peer reviewers are actually involved in, you cannot afford to miss out on hiring one for improving the quality of your dissertation. So, go ahead and opt for the services offered by a dissertation peer reviewer and you’ll benefit to the fullest.