Archives for category: Peer Review

The goal of peer review is to aid you in developing self-sufficient critical thinking as well as self-reliance in preparing a research paper so that you can critically assess your or your colleague’s writing once the course is over. Furthermore, peer review allows you to have a quick look into the perspective as well as approach of another student on the same project. This, in turn, facilitates viewing your own outlook and writing style in a new light. The reviewers provide simultaneous feedback for getting the right direction during the still in progress work as well as keep the details confidential. Therefore, the risk of making all the changes at once at the end is eliminated.

One of the vital services of peer reviewers involves improving the sentence structure so that it becomes clear and comprehensible. It is imperative for a dissertation to convey a proper meaning via a logical flow, whose absence makes it tough to comprehend the research. Therefore, it is essential that the peer reviewers eliminate such ambiguous or complex sentence structures.

Another service such reviewers offer is proper posting of quotations. When you properly place the quotations, it not only gives the credit but also preserves the integrity of your research document. Similarly, removing grammar and language errors is also a vital chore of peer reviewers. Error-free document is indispensable for making an in-depth impression on the final dissertation reviewing committee.


Peer review of research documents constitutes an essential task, as this ensures that the facts and theories stated therein are valid and reliable. In the field of doctoral education, with the help of methods of quantitative and qualitative, many academic projects have garnered wide evidences regarding processes and challenges faced in identifying the good practices in the field of quality assurance with respect to dissertations. Quantitative methods include survey mechanisms and qualitative ones include focus group meetings and different workshops. These methods determine the kind of quality control measures and they come up with different techniques in order to peer-review the doctoral dissertations.

Quality assurance helps broadly into two categories of enhancement and accountability. On one hand, it demonstrates the improvement in the quality of higher education imparted and dissertations thus produced. And on the other hand, it displays the accountability and authenticity to its stakeholders. There are many professional organizations which have peer reviewers associated with them.

Peer review is emphasized in institutions by electing supervisors to each dissertation. These supervisors help in focusing on the mentoring and editing activities whereas the author can research upon the research related objectives. Experienced supervisors can also help in bringing strong consensus but there needs to be one main researcher who needs to take the overall responsibility.